#Softplan 2016 for mac pro

ThatвЂ™s why we used both a MacBook Pro and mid-level Mac Pro in the tests. Neither company claimed that our testing procedure or the configuration of our virtual machines were incorrect or unfair.ДЈ) Other than providing licenses for both Fusion 8 and Parallels Desktop 11 for our tests, TekRevue was not remunerated by either company in any way, nor were the tests conducted or guided by anyone outside of TekRevue.Д¤) These products, and our review, are primarily targeted at consumers. YouвЂ™ll find this information on the ironically named вЂњTest Setup & MethodologyвЂќ page.Дў) We submitted our results and methodology to both Parallels and VMware to give each company a chance to respond. Let me clarify for you:ДЎ) The exact models and specifications for the testing hardware are listed in the article, along with the methodology used for the tests.

Here, Fusion trails Boot Camp by 13.8 percent in multi-core and 19.2 percent in single-core, suggesting that thereвЂ™s a limit to how efficient Parallels and Fusion can be with so many cores at their disposal. In that test, Fusion also came out on top, but trailed Boot Camp by only 0.6 percent in the multi-core test, and by 4.1 percent in single-core. One interesting result from this test, however, is the difference in performance between Boot Camp and the VMs as compared to the same test on the MacBook Pro. Our tests conclude with Cinebench, where Fusion 8 narrowly beats Parallels 11 in both multi-core and single-core rendering.

Softplan 2016 for mac